Comics like KRAZY KROW were published because at the time, they would sell half a million copies, not because they were artistic statements. Something all we "funny animal" cartoonists need to remember.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Popular Posts
-
AGAIN WITH THE BRUSH! SINGER ONE MOMENT'S MADNESS EXTRA SMOKY STRIPPER YOUTHFUL DANCESTEPS #3 Convul... -
Ub Iwerks' best character: The Old Maid. If the studio had offered a series of Old Maid cartoons, they would have made for t... -
A friend, Luis Baray has made a font of my lettering! I may make it a Reward for my $10 up Patreon Subscribers! https://www.patreon.com/milt... -
Test for CAPRICE, TEEN OF TOMORROW. Caprice flies into air and looks down below. (Missing a few drawings.) The She-Monster has propell...
-
Views of "The Mad Virgin", by Rik Wouters, Belgian, 1912. Sart-Tilman Open-Air Museum. http://www.museepla.ulg.ac.be/en/ ... -
Bluto in SHAVING MUGGS...acknowledging that this clean shaven Bluto was Brom Bones from Disney's LEGEND OF SLEEPY HOLLOW (1949). SHAVI... -
Just now, I've been doing a little impromptu editing of my (completed) novel, THAT'S SHOW BIZ! after finding some in-progress notes....
-
One can learn much about drawing womens' (not "cute girls'") faces by trying Marilyn Monroe 's (at least I do). F... -
Like Bettie Page, Baker provided an excellent artist's motif. From European magazines of the 1920s-1930s. From flickr.com ... -
CARTOONS FOR A HAPPY NEW YEAR! I posted this image on my website the year of GW Bush's second term. Didn't happen. (Bad like...
1 comment:
That is the problem today, people think they need to make a statement it their comics when they should be containing the very thing they're lacking, entertainment.
Post a Comment